This article was first published by The Common Sense
Through a single asset manager, the South African government has become the dominant shareholder across the formal economy. The Public Investment Corporation — Africa’s largest asset manager with over R3 trillion under management — is the biggest or second-biggest shareholder in most of SA’s major listed companies: banks, miners, telecoms, retailers. That’s remarkable concentration. But the BizNews Econ Desk raises the more intriguing question: does this give the state control over business, or business a quiet veto over the state? Force foolish mandates onto the corporates, and you undermine the very pension assets of government workers. It may be SA’s most underappreciated check on ideological excess.
From The Common Sense
Through a single asset manager, the South African government has become the dominant shareholder across the formal economy. The Public Investment Corporation (PIC) is a state-owned company that invests the pension savings of government workers. It is the largest or second-largest shareholder in most of the country’s biggest listed companies, among them its banks, telecoms operators, miners, and retailers, giving the state influence in many of the country’s big businesses.
The PIC is Africa’s largest asset manager, with more than R3 trillion under management. It is also one of the largest public pension fund managers globally.
Listed equities are the PIC’s largest asset class.
The companies below are among South Africa’s largest. In nearly all of them, the PIC is the largest or second-largest shareholder.
The PIC carries a dual mandate: to grow its clients’ money and, at the same time, to advance the developmental and transformation objectives set by the state.
As the dominant or controlling shareholder across the country’s banks, telecommunications networks, mining houses, and retailers, it has the potential pull to influence board decisions and policy – and could do this in areas ranging from racial and gender transformation to climate policy and commercial strategy.
However, that is only one perspective on the potential power balance that flows from the PIC ownership dominance of so many large companies. The other side of the balance, and the more interesting one, is the sway those shareholdings afford corporate actors over the government and its polices. Were the government to force foolish or ideologically driven mandates onto the corporates, the effect would be to undermine their growth and profitability and thereby directly undercut the assets invested by the state on behalf of its employees. In turn the political effects of this would be damaging.
Read more:
The PIC and its role in South African business may counterintuitively be a useful conduit for some measure of pragmatism and sense to enter the government and the Cabinet – in as far that ever occurs.
This article was first published by The Common Sense and is republished with permission.
Sign up for your early morning brew of the BizNews Insider to keep you up to speed with the content that matters. The newsletter will land in your inbox every morning on weekdays. Register here.
Support South Africa’s bastion of independent journalism, offering balanced insights on investments, business, and the political economy, by joining BizNews Premium. Register here.
If you prefer WhatsApp for updates, sign up to the BizNews channel here.
Leave a Reply